I didn’t close it and I wasn’t part of the decision making process to close it and I didn’t say you were necroposting, mate.
This is honestly not the path you want to take with all this. I am giving you the kindest warning you are going to get about this in a good faith process to tell you that you don’t need to use all of our communication methods to post a wall of text about your issues because we don’t reply to them according to your time table. You wasted your time as much as ours by doing that.
This is not more than you shifting blame so you don’t have to be accountable to everything I just described. It’s disrespectful as well as disingenuous. You were told which room to use and you ignored me.
All the time you wasted could have been put to better use by making a package to help all users. If you don’t know how to do that, being honest is also less of a time waste than pretending to be a hard ass on a development forum after someone points out how you are wasting everyone’s time including your own.
Your behavior here and in Matrix is inappropriate. Again, you don’t need to spam all of our comms because you are not getting an answer when you think you should. As far as a moderator, I may as well be but I don’t throw my weight around. If you were trying to find out how far you could go before you got moderated off the forum then I suggest you go through Coffee break and read things there. It takes a lot, but that doesn’t mean you can act how you are and not be called out for it.
You also are not my parent. Chances are, I’m old enough to be yours given your behavior. I think it’s safe to say you would rather consume OMLx than contribute in any meaningful way. At least be honest and say you don’t want to package, make a request, and get in line with everyone else.
Other than that, I would ask that you be respectful before someone does moderate you out of our comms. I would never advocate for that, but I can’t speak for everyone here.
I didn’t close it and I wasn’t part of the decision making process to close it and I didn’t say you were necroposting, mate.
You didn’t say that, but a moderator did in the thread I responded to. Didn’t bother to read or look at that, did you? Not everything is about you.
This is honestly not the path you want to take with all this. I am giving you the kindest warning you are going to get about this in a good faith process to tell you that you don’t need to use all of our communication methods to post a wall of text about your issues because we don’t reply to them according to your time table. You wasted your time as much as ours by doing that.
Didn’t do any of that. Feel free to message me on Element to show where I made that mistake to show me.
This is not more than you shifting blame so you don’t have to be accountable to everything I just described. It’s disrespectful as well as disingenuous. You were told which room to use and you ignored me.
No it isn’t, you just decided to try to be pedantic for no reason on your first response to this thread. I explained the situation and it didn’t make you look good. Literally just making stuff up now.
Here’s your only message directed at me on Matrix this month:
@wolfdaemon
GCC version:
wolfdaemon@sigma:~$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20250405 (OpenMandriva)
Everyone, if llvm is an option then please use it. A small search shows that gcc is not required: GitHub · Where software is built
rbenv/ruby-build - GitHub
A tool to download, compile, and install Ruby on Unix-like systems. - rbenv/ruby-build
If we don’t package it, then you should probably build mainstream stuff from source or use flatpak.
We don’t support binaries that are built outside of our build environment. You will need to get upstream help for that.
If “You will need to get upstream help for that” is your version of “You were told which room to use and you ignored me.”, then you need to work on communication, then. Because those two things aren’t congruent.
Personally, I think it’s you who need to be accountable for your unnecessary comments now. This is getting absurd.
All the time you wasted could have been put to better use by making a package to help all users. If you don’t know how to do that, being honest is also less of a time waste than pretending to be a hard ass on a development forum after someone points out how you are wasting everyone’s time including your own.
Feel free to show the class where I said that I knew how to package things. I was literally asking questions surrounding how packages are built in OMLx so as to see if I could figure it how. I find it so absurd that you think making a support thread to document an issue is “not helpful” and “time wasting” to where you’re trying to accuse me of something I didn’t do. There’s a reason why software documentation, support forums/chats exist. Not sure why you’re barking up the “just make a package, bro” on a support thread.
You need an ego check.
Your behavior here and in Matrix is inappropriate. Again, you don’t need to spam all of our comms because you are not getting an answer when you think you should. As far as a moderator, I may as well be but I don’t throw my weight around. If you were trying to find out how far you could go before you got moderated off the forum then I suggest you go through Coffee break and read things there. It takes a lot, but that doesn’t mean you can act how you are and not be called out for it.
I think it’s obvious we need a third party opinion on this, because you’re hallucinating events that didn’t happen. Stop mini-modding.
You also are not my parent. Chances are, I’m old enough to be yours given your behavior. I think it’s safe to say you would rather consume OMLx than contribute in any meaningful way.
Ah yes, because I’m so dishonest.
Other than that, I would ask that you be respectful before someone does moderate you out of our comms. I would never advocate for that, but I can’t speak for everyone here.
The reason you “won’t advocate for it” is because you know you’re wrong. Just making the hole bigger for yourself.
@wolfdaemon did you log out and log back into terminal (closing all terminal sessions if any)? The way to change ruby version using rbenv is (with version 3.4.7 as example),
rbenv global 3.4.7
This you probably knew.
I can confirm that after executing this command, ruby -v still shows old version. I was surprised too. rbenv versions command shows the newly selected version with an asterix. Taking a cue, I exited terminal (not desktop session) and launched terminal again. This time ruby -v shows the correct version.
However, this happened only first time. I did not take screenshot of it to share. So, when I tried to reproduce, it started behaving and reflected the version changes correctly.
Okay, I looked at this today, because my stupid website is generated via Jekyll, and since I set it up in 2021, it’s an old Ruby version (2.7.3). After the UM when I install OM on my personal machine, if I ever want to create more blog entries, I have to get this set up myself.
I followed the instructions exactly, and I installed Ruby 2.7.3 (now out of support, of course) and was able to get ancient Ruby and ancient Jekyll running.
This is related to my first “inconsistent behavior” post in this thread. For whatever reason, both packages will point to a non-existent file/directory, resulting in the system Ruby to be the global/default one.
Step 2 might be unnecessary for you/in the future if rbenv-installer plays nice.
Sometimes the initialization takes a few seconds, it’s easiest here just to close every instance of your terminal emulator and wait before trying again, especially after doing Step 2.
From my testing, at the time of writing, parts of this was tested on OpenMandriva Lx ROCK 6.0 Vandium, and my most recent test was done on OpenMandriva Lx 25.90 (Nickel) Cooker. Any updates to this as the distro changes are most welcome.
