I think it is a hinderance and allow me to tell you why I think this. I have both dialectic as well as rhetorical arguments about this. I have 3 Gen Z and 1 gen Alpha Employee. I literally had them read the Free Software Manifesto by Richard Stallman. (The GNU Manifesto - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation) You know, that one. Their response was to laugh, say it was “gay” and “cringe”. It was a total joke to them.
Hmm, who do we believe? Your anecdote of a supposed whopping sample size of 4 immature young people, with whom your total effort of “free software advocacy” was handing them a book and telling them to read a book one singular time? Because children just naturally adore & embrace reading/consuming manifestos without any mentorship assistance by default, right?
Or, do we look at the numbers and observe the actual data surrounding the exponentially increasing marketshare of a free software OS kernel platform whose real competition is two other proprietary ones?
Real tough one, I know.
How are we to get young people on board with fake and gay garbage like this?
By consistently talking and demonstrably showing how cool free software is, and highlighting how cringe proprietary software is. In part, you’re helping us as we speak.
You can keep on saying this faggy stuff if you want, I can’t stop you, but it is certainly a hinderance to growth of the platform.
Like I said, free software is inevitable. The trend is going up and has been for many years. If we wish to keep it, we must continue to do what we do now instead of listening to what you’re saying now. You could change your tune any moment if you wanted to.
If it is free software, I still pay because why should some dude work for my benefit without being compensated? The unspoken rule is that you should pay for what you use (at least that should be the rule).
I agree. We all are morally obligated in a way to pay. Fiat isn’t the only way to pay, advocacy is another, writing code is another, giving support to help tickets is another, that is in part why I contribute to free software projects that I use.
Either way, paying this money is not a loss to me, this software helps me generate wealth like I never imagined as a young man when I listed my first auction on eBay.
Which is why it is so queer that you disparage the very same legal/mental framework that allows it to exist and continue existing. It literally makes zero sense why you’re simping for proprietary software right now.